flows0002 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
They speak of stats when referring to guns, but the global death stats state disease, Hunger, Auto Accidents, Blunt instruments, War, Medical error, abortions cause more death. Doctors cause more death then guns, look it up. These guys with their headsets and hip clothes think that taking away guns will help and they know better than law abiding citizens. They do not have the balls to tackle the real issue of human suffering because big banks, big pharma, big corp all have them by the balls. siggyboss (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yes. caviper1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think you mean unknown "population" size, right? Luis Ulloa (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Guns are one of the businesses of the U.S. in the world and the problem is not the U.S. citizen carrying guns because there is a control and the database will know who is the owner. The problem is the illegal sales of thousands of U.S. weapons that are authorized for sale outside the U.S. and arrive in Mexico and other countries of the world. It does not end the problem as the drug that enters U.S. by the dependence that are as consuming drugs and arms business like the movie Lord of War. Luis Ulloa (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Operation Fast and Furious was a channel of introduction of weapons into Mexico that reached illicit hands. Many U.S. operations are funded with the same gun sales in Mexico to operate or infiltrate drug groups but doing illegal business with the weapons that they kill innocent citizens in Mexico. RosenKrantz666 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
look no further than govt and wall st. military ind. complex.there's no mystery: it's always been govt, MIC and intel networks that supply proxy wars. siggyboss (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
70% of an unknown sample size is worthless data. One can not extrapolate such data to the bigger picture. For example, assume the total size is 100. A same size of 4 is selected and 75% of them have an attribute concerning origin. Thus, only 3 out of 100 actually have that attribute for certain. The other 97% is an unknown. In gist, the analysis is biased. Andy Smith-Thomas (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"Enslavement always follows disarmament of civilians." I call bullshit. There are many countries around the world that do not allow their civilian population to own guns, my own home country included. I am not enslaved. utubesgai (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Let's face it, people who say such things about the second amendment have 9 times out of 10 never fired or even laid hands on a real gun in their life. Also, more often then not they don't live in the US and all the information they have gathered on the US and firearms is from the news. Why these people feel the need to act like experts on something they have 0 real understanding of is beyond me. pokenei (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Let's face it, the american constitution that give people the right bear arms is old, no longer valid, and therefore should be scrapped. To maintain that bleep in the constitution is just stupid. Those who argued against banning guns are either criminals, hunters, gun dealers, or idiots. Although non-banned, Canada has much more strict gun control, and therefore much fewer murders or deaths by gunshot. And much of the illegal guns circulating in Canada are in fact coming from the States. |
